TT-MKT-101 · Ongoing

Drive ICP Engagement on LinkedIn

$3,000 / month

Ongoing outcome. Start or stop anytime.

Your time: 45 minutes per week

the overview

3 min · no signup

the outcomes

Primary outcome

Drive ICP Engagement on LinkedIn

Engagement is counted only inside your target account list. Everything below is measured weekly and reported monthly.

  • Secondary outcomes
  • 01

    Increase Impressions

    Total views of published posts and comments.

  • 02

    Drive Profile Views

    Views of your founder and company profiles.

  • 03

    Increase ICP Followers

    New followers matched to your named target account list.

the deliverables

Work logExample · Weekly
Post · draft
Owner
Signal & Co. · reviewed by you
Arrives as
Item in your service thread
Reference
TT-MKT-101-D01

Visible in your service thread as it ships.

the methodology

Strategy first. The work is downstream of it.

Attention from the wrong accounts is worthless. We build a narrow point of view, publish it repeatedly, and measure reach only inside your buying list.

  1. 01
    01Week 1

    Fix the account list first

    We reconcile your ICP definition against your CRM and build the named list of people whose attention counts. Nothing publishes before that list exists.

  2. 02
    02Week 1–2

    Choose three arguments, not twenty topics

    We pull the claims your buyers argue about from win/loss notes and sales calls, then commit to a small set of positions worth repeating for a quarter.

  3. 03
    03Weekly

    Publish, then work the thread

    Posts ship on a fixed weekly rhythm in your voice. The real work is the hour after: replying, pulling named accounts into the comments, moving warm replies to DMs.

  4. 04
    04Monthly

    Recalibrate on reach, not likes

    Each month we score which arguments reached the list and which fell flat, retire the losers, and push more weight behind what your buyers responded to.

The service decides

  • Which argument runs each week
  • Which comments and replies get worked
  • When a topic is retired for underperforming

You decide

  • Anything that states a claim about your product
  • Named customers and numbers used publicly
  • Quarterly narrative direction

Held to this bar

Reach inside your named account list, replies from buying titles, and a publishing rhythm that never slips a week.

Miss it and we change the provider, not the promise.

what we need from you

Technology requirements
LinkedIn profile access
Founder or exec account, publishing rights
Work email
For notifications and the review queue
CRM (read)
To match engagement back to pipeline
Knowledge requirements
ICP definition
Titles, company size, segments you actually win
Target account list
The named accounts that matter this quarter
Positioning docs
How you describe the problem and yourself today
Time per week

45 minutes

Asynchronous. No standing meetings — per week, whenever it suits you.

Your role in that time
  1. 01Approve or edit the week's posts in the review queue
  2. 02Answer one clarifying question thread from the service
  3. 03Flag replies you want a human to take over
  4. 04Review the monthly ICP reach readout

Currently powered by

Signal & Co.

“Providers are continuously evaluated against the Three Thousand standard.” We own the relationship, the specification, and the quality bar — and replace the provider whenever a better one exists.

reviews

4.9

Based on 49 verified reviews

89%
still running the service after three months

Distribution

  • 5 ★84%
  • 4 ★12%
  • 3 ★4%
  • 2 ★0%
  • 1 ★0%

How reviews work here

  • Reviews are tied to a paid service, so nobody can review something they never ran.
  • They rate the outcome and the Three Thousand experience — not whichever provider happened to fulfil it that month.
  • A service that drops below the standard gets a new provider. Reviews are one of the signals we use to decide.
  • Ran without me having to manage it

    The inputs took an afternoon to hand over and then it just ran. I get the monthly readout, I approve what needs approving, and I stopped thinking about it. That was the whole reason we bought it.

    Head of Marketing

    Series A, B2B SaaS

    Verified · running 7 months

  • Cheaper and clearer than the agency it replaced

    We were paying an agency roughly three times this for something with a fuzzier scope. Here the deliverables are listed and they show up. No scope conversations, no quarterly renegotiation.

    Founder

    Seed, developer tools

    Verified · running 1 year

  • Slow first month, strong after that

    Month one was mostly calibration and I was nervous. By month two the work matched our voice and the reporting was genuinely useful. Would have liked a clearer heads-up that ramp takes a few weeks.

    VP Marketing

    Series B, fintech

    Verified · running 5 months

more ongoing services

6 more · $3,000 / month